Lily Hammer
9:13 Wed Aug 10
Re: Chemtrails
|
All this chemtrail stuff is quite probably hysterical nonsense, but it won't die down because of the core of truth about the concept, which is the infamous Operation LAC.
This was when the US military sprayed Cadmium Sulfide over areas in the states in the 50s and 60s. They did it to measure and monitor how chemical attacks could spread with the weather. I don't think they meant harm in any sinister way, but the stuff may have caused some birth defects, but most opinions were it was a relatively harmless amount,the equivalent of a pack of cigarettes worth of it (it's found in cigarettes, along with all kinds of wonderful shit) over a period of 31 months.
So it was secret, and embarrassing when they had to apologise later, but not part of an evil plan, just a case of "Whoops, best not continue this study, hope nobody finds out, oh shit they found out, sorry." End of story.
|
AfM
8:42 Wed Aug 10
Re: Chemtrails
|
I'm not sure you really appreciate how science works, Piston.
Science is the least wrong way of looking at things. It improves and self corrects.
You'll have to point me in the direction of JPL's allusion. I suspect it might be a conspiracy illusion....like the lithium.
|
PistonHammered
8:31 Wed Aug 10
Re: Chemtrails
|
So at least we can all agree that government agencies DO put stuff in our atmosphere which is a far cry from some that claim they do not. Correct?
The government, you know, those fine upstanding pillars of truth and justice, tell us that it is harmless and yet JPL allude to "rogue groups" in the geoscience field. Therefore wouldn't it be prudent to question what they are doing rather than accepting something on face value.
The science of diet is a good example where the food industry got it completely wrong over the last 30 or 40 years and it is only recently that changes have been made in food recommendations due to pressure from scientists that would have been laughed at 10 years ago.
Vigilance is not a bad thing when it comes to the ideas from the supposed authority.
|
AfM
7:37 Wed Aug 10
Re: Chemtrails
|
Yes, Piston.
They use lithium in the upper atmosphere to study things, to do science.
It simply isn't anything to do with the nonsense the chemtrail loonies spout.
|
bruuuno
5:49 Wed Aug 10
Re: Chemtrails
|
TEAM WEIRDY BEARDY
|
riosleftsock
5:44 Wed Aug 10
Re: Chemtrails
|
One flew over the cuckoo's nest.
Much easier to keep them all in one place.
|
PistonHammered
5:39 Wed Aug 10
Re: Chemtrails
|
AfM 10:25 Wed Aug 10
AfM, how are you mate, good I hope.
Sorry but there is no garden path, I just have the information that I have gleaned from JPL's own sites.
Geoengineering is the name of the science field that deals with the planet's environment and one of the techniques they use as they try to "fight" the Co2 problem is they refer to as "Atmospheric Aerosol" where planes will lace the atmosphere with a particle component, I thought they used lithium but I could be wrong (don't really care as the major point I was making is that they do do this). JPL say the reason behind this technique is their need to study wind patterns in our upper atmosphere and they need a particle that has "hang time".
I have also watched JPL lectures where the speaker refers to rogue geoengineers that experiment outside the accepted scientific/political boundaries. Might be nothing but maybe it is. Who would know? Many people are just trying to get on with their lives.
|
joey5000
12:28 Wed Aug 10
Re: Chemtrails
|
Excellent work, ohgodno. I haven't seen a someone get destroyed on WHO to that level since the one about Geedee? leaving a voicemail on Terry Brown's voicemail and falling down the stairs? I hope somebody still has that post saved.
|
Darby_
12:10 Wed Aug 10
Re: Chemtrails
|
Honestly, I not really worried about chemtrails. What I'm really worried about is crop circles.
|
Thames Ironworks
11:53 Wed Aug 10
Re: Chemtrails
|
I know a fella who is mad about this. Goes out in the morning at dawn and watches the sky to see how it changes through the day. Even reckons he can feel the difference it makes to his behaviour.
Are we really so worried about being controlled and manipulated by a higher order?
|
AfM
10:25 Wed Aug 10
Re: Chemtrails
|
Piston,
You've been led up the garden path somewhat on the lithium.
http://www.snopes.com/nasa-lithium-chemtrails-conspiracy/
|
Ronald_antly
9:27 Wed Aug 10
Re: Chemtrails
|
:^) 1:49 Wed Aug 10
Incorrect. My response was delivered as soon as I read his drivel.
|
cholo
7:59 Wed Aug 10
Re: Chemtrails
|
Piston
Science is not an institution (although there are institutes of science), it's a method of working things out. Someone could use science to prove chemtrails* but so far that hasn't happened for some reason.
*when we say chemtrails we mean this don't we...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemtrail_conspiracy_theory
|
PistonHammered
5:15 Wed Aug 10
Re: Chemtrails
|
ohgodno 3:34 Tue Aug 9
You pompous, pious prick! In your attempt to sound sage like you actually called it in your first sentence when you describe yourself as an arsecunt. You should have ended there mate while you were ahead.
In this world there seems to be two sets of opposing groups. Those that agree with most everything the popular opinion teaches them via, news outlets, schooling, politics, science etc. (Not trying to be argumentative). Then there are those that question these platforms of authority because they do not agree with many of the claims of these institutions. I am guessing that through the years both groups have been right and both have been wrong as they argue their point.
Your indignation is laughable, your piece reads like a spurned girl friend.....you're right and anyone that doesn't agree with you can fuck off.
I have had similar arguments with people on this site but in the end it's a forum where people share thoughts and ideas. If a subject rubs you the wrong way why do you bother opening up the thread? I think you do it so you can tell everyone what a fucking genius you are. In future why don't you challenge the facts rather than insulting the poster.
BTW, governments have admitted to spraying chemicals i.e. Lithium, into the atmosphere since the 60s. The argument shouldn't be "IF" but "WHY" are they doing this. One reason they give is that they are researching the weather/atmosphere.
|
claret on my shirt
3:15 Wed Aug 10
Re: Chemtrails
|
Are we still talking about chemtrails and wedding cakes?
|
:^)
1:49 Wed Aug 10
Re: Chemtrails
|
Looks more like you've been stewing for hours about how best to reply, and have finally settled on something a little bit POOFTARD?
ohgodno 1 - R_a 0
|
Ronald_antly
1:40 Wed Aug 10
Re: Chemtrails
|
Well !!!
I've just had a read of goodgodno's diatribe.
He comes across (once again) as someone who takes it as a personal affront if there is a suggestion of some facts which he has not been in 'on the ground floor of', and that someone else has to point out to him.
He therefore has to go on the attack.
Just my opinion, of course.
|
Ronald_antly
11:58 Tue Aug 9
Re: Chemtrails
|
Er, yeah, I'm absolutely CRESTFALLEN.
N.B.
I stopped reading after he admitted to being an arsecunt.
|
The Joker
6:45 Tue Aug 9
Re: Chemtrails
|
*throws towel into the ring to save ron from further punishment*
|
The Cult Of Bob
5:56 Tue Aug 9
Re: Chemtrails
|
Fucking hell tone.
You just got REKT mate.
|
Worst Case Ontario
4:05 Tue Aug 9
Re: Chemtrails
|
Water off a duck's back to people like our Ronny, I'm afraid.
|
| 
